A pedestrian passes in front of a Charles Schwab Corp. office building in New York.
Gabriella Angotti-Jones | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Charles Schwab’s proposed acquisition of TD Ameritrade is stirring up worry among financial advisors.
Schwab on Monday announced it would buy TD in a $26 billion all-stock transaction. Together, the firms will serve 24 million brokerage accounts, accounting for more than $5 trillion in client assets.
Both firms also have massive footprints in the registered investment advisory industry, where they custody investors’ assets and execute trades.
They also provide firms with the technology to simplify their workflow and allow advisors to focus on financial planning.
“Together we can deliver the ultimate client experience for retail investors and independent registered investment advisors,” said Stephen Boyle, TD Ameritrade’s newly announced interim president and CEO, in a statement.
The merger will create a massive custodian in a field that often has limited choice for these RIAs.
For now, there will be no immediate impact for clients of either firm, according to Schwab’s posted list of frequently asked questions on the merger.
TD and Schwab will remain separate entities and operate as usual until the transaction is complete, which is expected by the second half of 2020, with the formal integration of both custodians to follow, Schwab said.
That migration is expected to take between 18 and 36 months, according to Schwab’s FAQ.
Clients may stay put
Clients are likely to keep their financial advisor, even amid a change in custodians, industry experts say.
That’s because RIA businesses generally have so-called negative consent provisions in their paperwork when they take on new clients, meaning if the firm changes a service provider, the client has agreed to go along.
“I might change custodians if I think it’s the best thing for you, and by signing this you are agreeing that you will go, unless you opt out,” said Danny Sarch, founder and owner of Leitner Sarch Consultants.
Nevertheless, a client who is content with the service he or she receives will likely stay put.
“The client is generally loyal to the advisor, as long as the advisor keeps the client front of mind as he makes a decision,” Sarch said.
Ariel Skelley | DigitalVision | Getty Images
In the RIA world, there are four custodians that make up the lion’s share of the market: Fidelity, Pershing, Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade.
Schwab, Fidelity, TD and Pershing collectively hold 80% of the RIA firms’ $4 trillion in advisory assets, according to Cerulli Associates.
TD’s specialty has been on the small RIA market, catering to firms with fewer than $100 million in assets under management, Sarch said.
“Pershing ignores that space, but Fidelity, Schwab and TD have traditionally competed,” he said.
Advisors have raised concerns about the prospect of less competition.
“What does it mean for costs for advisors like me and for our end clients?” asked Daniel Tobias, a certified financial planner at Passport Wealth Management in Cornelius, North Carolina. His firm handles custody of client assets with TD.
“Or what if the service goes down, we have fewer options and we’re that much more captive?” Tobias asked.
Compassionate Eye Foundation | Getty Images
RIAs who are just starting out on their own or whose business model isn’t centered on gathering assets have also turned to TD for their services.
In 2016, XY Planning Network, a group of fee-only advisors who charge clients a subscription fee rather than a percentage of assets under management, partnered with TD to make its services available to those advisors without requiring them to manage a minimum level of assets under management.
Indeed, 600 of the 1,100 fee-only advisors on the XY Planning Network are using TD’s services through this agreement and manage less than $10 million, said Alan Moore, co-founder of XY Planning Network.
“The question is, ‘Will they continue to support the smaller RIA market?'” Moore asked. “I hope they see the value of working with people who are starting in the business and growing their firms and who may never have $50 million in assets.”
“The custodians have to make money, but there are firms that will never meet those minimum asset requirements, and we’re losing the only option we have,” he said.